How will computers evolve over the next 100 years?

To call the evolution of the computer meteoric seems like an
understatement. Consider Moore's Law, an observation that Gordon Moore made
back in 1965. He noticed that the number of transistors engineers could cram
onto a silicon chip doubled every year or so. That manic pace slowed over the
years to a slightly more modest 24-month cycle.
Awareness of the breakneck speed at which computer
technology develops has seeped into the public consciousness. We've all heard
the joke about buying a computer at the store only to find out it's obsolete by
the time you get home. What will the future hold for computers?
Assuming microprocessor manufacturers can continue to live
up to Moore's Law, the processing power of our computers should double every
two years. That would mean computers 100 years from now would be
1,125,899,906,842,624 times more powerful than the current models. That's hard
to imagine.
But even Gordon Moore would caution against assuming Moore's
Law will hold out that long. In 2005, Moore said that as transistors reach the
atomic scale we may encounter fundamental barriers we can't cross [source:
Dubash]. At that point, we won't be able to cram more transistors in the same
amount of space.
We may get around that barrier by building larger processor
chips with more transistors. But transistors generate heat, and a hot processor
can cause a computer to shut down. Computers with fast processors need
efficient cooling systems to avoid overheating. The larger the processor chip,
the more heat the computer will generate when working at full speed.
Another tactic is to switch to multi-core architecture. A
multi-core processor dedicates part of its processing power to each core.
They're good at handling calculations that can be broken down into smaller
components; however, they aren't as good at handling large computational
problems that can't be broken down.
Future computers may rely on a completely different model
than traditional machines. What if we abandon the old transistor-based
processor?
Optics, Quantum Processing and DNA Computers
Fiber-optic technology has already begun to revolutionize
computers. Fiber-optic data lines carry information at incredible speeds and
aren't vulnerable to electromagnetic interference like classic cables. What if
we were to build a computer that uses light to transmit information instead of
electricity?
Photonic transistors could become part of a quantum
computer. Unlike traditional computers, which use binary digits or bits to
perform operations, quantum computers use quantum bits or qubits. A bit is
either a 0 or a 1. Think of it like a switch that is either off or on. But a
qubit can be both a 0 and a 1 (or anything in between) at the same time. The
switch is both off and on and everything in between.
A working quantum computer should be able to solve big
problems that can be split into smaller ones much faster than a traditional
computer. We call these problems embarrassingly parallel problems. But quantum
computers are, by their very nature, unstable. If the quantum state of the
computer is upset, the machine could revert to the computing power of a
traditional computer. Like the optical transmitter created at ETH Zurich, quantum
computers are kept at just a few degrees above absolute zero to preserve their
quantum states.
Perhaps the future of computers lies inside of us. Teams of
computer scientists are working to develop computers that use DNA to process
information. This combination of computer science and biology could lead the
way to the next generation of computers. A DNA computer might have several
advantages over traditional machines. For example, DNA is a plentiful and cheap
resource. If we discover a way to harness DNA as a data processing tool, it
could revolutionize the computer field.
Ubiquitous Computing
A popular theme in science fiction stories set in the future
is ubiquitous computing. In this future, computers have become so small and
pervasive that they are in practically everything. You might have computer
sensors in your floor that can monitor your physical health. Computers in your
car that can assist you when you drive to work. And computers practically
everywhere track your every move.
It's a vision of the future that is both exhilarating and
frightening. On the one hand, computer networks would become so robust that
we'd always have a fast, reliable connection to the Internet. You could
communicate with anyone you choose no matter where you were with no worries
about interruption in service. But on the other hand, it would also become
possible for corporations, governments or other organizations to gather
information about you and keep tabs on you wherever you go.
We've seen steps toward ubiquitous computing over the last
decade. Municipal Wi-Fi projects and 4G technologies like LTE and WiMAX have
extended network computing far beyond the world of wired machines. You can
purchase a smartphone and access petabytes of information on the World Wide Web
in a matter of seconds. Sensors in traffic stoplights and biometric devices can
detect our presence. It may not be long before nearly everything we come into
contact with has a computer or sensor inside it.
We may also see massive transformations in user interface
technology. Currently, most computers rely on physical input interfaces like a
computer mouse, keyboard, tracking pad or other surface upon which we input
commands. There are also computer programs that can recognize your voice or
track your eye movements to execute commands. Computer scientists and
neurologists are working on various brain-computer interfaces that will allow
people to manipulate computers using only their thoughts. Who knows? The
computers of the future may react seamlessly with our desires.
To extrapolate out to 100 years is difficult. Technological
progress isn't necessarily linear or logarithmic. We may experience decades of
progress followed by a period in which we make very little headway as we bump
up against unforeseen barriers. On the other hand, according to some futurists,
there may be no meaningful difference between computers and humans within 100
years. In that world, we'll be transformed into a new species that can improve
upon itself at a pace unimaginable to us in our current forms. Whatever the
future may hold, it's a safe bet to assume the machines we rely upon will be
very different from today's computers.



No comments:
Post a Comment